Another urban nomad kind-of-an-evening was disturbed by yet another slammin' soirée courtesy the Indian guy. In addition, he took a second extremely noisy shower, banging his shit against the wall over and over again just like he did at 5am this morning. The filthy bathroom is between our rooms on the second floor. And, I am not sure why he must go in and out of his room up to ten times or more in succession, each time slamming the door. Of course, I have witnessed him pacing around like a trapped wild animal in the second floor common area for no apparent reason.
At the library, I completed reading the book, "Who Wrote the Dead Sea Scrolls," by Norman Golb. The second to last chapter was the most interesting. I have also mummified the reading of Lawrence Schiffman's book. In addition, I have located two books by John Allegro. So, I will probably wrap up my research about the Dead Sea Scrolls after perusing them.
I have continued to ruminate about the origin of life, specifically that of humanity, without reliance on the account in the Good Book. I cannot even begin to ascertain where human life originated. Evolutionists believe that humans appeared first in Africa, no doubt because of the large number of monkeys, apes, baboons, and gorillas that reside in the region. From human migration patterns, however, the Mesopotamian area appears to be a logical choice. I have previously discussed that, given the fragile nature of humans, the Creator would have had to protect and nurture the first humans in order to assure that the species would survive.
Given the amazing faculties possessed by humans, I tend to believe that less than a thousand years would have been necessary for the latter to develop a written language. I can assume that several generations could have survived with an oral tradition alone. Subsequently, a written language had to be imperative. Thus, I do not believe that humans were around longer than 6,000 years ago, or 7,000 years maximum. Whatever connection that we had with the Creator was lost with the original oral tradition. The latter thesis makes sense given human social progression. As human clans eventually metamorphosed into kingdoms, the kings and emperors began to envision themselves as gods or of possessing superhuman powers. Self-appointed priests and prophets also conjured up fictitious gods and deities. Since the Creator left us to our own devices, the oral tradition was soon replaced by what we can generally describe as myths and legends.
Incidentally, I have wondering about the allegedly high savings rate being quoted by various "talking heads." The idea that "Americans" are now saving 6.9 percent of income did not make sense to me given the high unemployment rate and the ensuing real estate fiasco. I had assumed that the affluent class was doing all of the saving using their ill-gotten gains. Michael Hudson has cleared up the perception problem:
Happy-face media reporting of economic news is providing the usual upbeat spin on Friday's debt-deflation statistics. The Commerce Department's National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) for May show that U.S. "savings" are now absorbing 6.9 percent of income.Very interesting. The article is titled, "Debt Deflation Arrives," and it appeared on the Counterpunch site.
I put the word "savings" in quotation marks because this 6.9 per cent is not what most people think of as savings. It is not money in the bank to draw out in rainy-day emergencies like losing one's job, as thousands are every day. The statistic means that 6.9 per cent of national income is being earmarked to pay down debt – the highest savings rate in 15 years, up from actually negative rates (living on borrowed credit) just a few years ago. The only way in which these savings are "money in the bank" is that they are being paid by consumers to their banks and credit card companies.